Destroy the Trolls | Page 23 | Battle Forum | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Destroy the Trolls
February 25, 2016
7:57 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
221sp_Permalink sp_Print

sandra said
I am done taking shit for making the right suggestion. Why you soo salty at1? :p

Stop trashing this beautiful forum!Kiss

"it is easy to grow crazy"

March 6, 2016
6:23 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
222sp_Permalink sp_Print

"it is easy to grow crazy"

March 7, 2016
10:32 am
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
223sp_Permalink sp_Print

"it is easy to grow crazy"

March 9, 2016
7:29 am
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
224sp_Permalink sp_Print

"it is easy to grow crazy"

March 13, 2016
8:54 am
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
225sp_Permalink sp_Print

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9907009

Based on a calculation of neural decoherence rates, we argue that that the degrees of freedom of the human brain that relate to cognitive processes should be thought of as a classical rather than quantum system, i.e., that there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the current classical approach to neural network simulations. We find that the decoherence timescales ~10^{-13}-10^{-20} seconds are typically much shorter than the relevant dynamical timescales (~0.001-0.1 seconds), both for regular neuron firing and for kink-like polarization excitations in microtubules. This conclusion disagrees with suggestions by Penrose and others that the brain acts as a quantum computer, and that quantum coherence is related to consciousness in a fundamental way.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

September 2, 2016
2:13 pm
Avatar
khanster
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 708
Member Since:
September 19, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
226sp_Permalink sp_Print

at1with0 said
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9907009

Based on a calculation of neural decoherence rates, we argue that that the degrees of freedom of the human brain that relate to cognitive processes should be thought of as a classical rather than quantum system, i.e., that there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the current classical approach to neural network simulations. We find that the decoherence timescales ~10^{-13}-10^{-20} seconds are typically much shorter than the relevant dynamical timescales (~0.001-0.1 seconds), both for regular neuron firing and for kink-like polarization excitations in microtubules. This conclusion disagrees with suggestions by Penrose and others that the brain acts as a quantum computer, and that quantum coherence is related to consciousness in a fundamental way.  

http://phys.org/news/2014-01-d.....rates.html

A review and update of a controversial 20-year-old theory of consciousness published in Physics of Life Reviews claims that consciousness derives from deeper level, finer scale activities inside brain neurons. The recent discovery of quantum vibrations in "microtubules" inside brain neurons corroborates this theory, according to review authors Stuart Hameroff and Sir Roger Penrose. They suggest that EEG rhythms (brain waves) also derive from deeper level microtubule vibrations, and that from a practical standpoint, treating brain microtubule vibrations could benefit a host of mental, neurological, and cognitive conditions.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-01-d.....s.html#jCp

September 5, 2016
6:54 am
Avatar
khanster
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 708
Member Since:
September 19, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
227sp_Permalink sp_Print

Testing ...testing ...123 ...testing

April 14, 2017
6:36 pm
Avatar
notdej
New Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
April 14, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
228sp_Permalink sp_Print

Define 'Troll'?

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online: AndreiHexZT
44 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10075

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9242

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3271

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 22300

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8232

Posts: 120816

Newest Members:

AndreiHexZT, LadyCrarlQL, GeorgecrodsCJ, abhia ljuiveKZ, EtotaltoigoXA, ThomasQuapeDU, RonaldexpapVG, JasonCorAC, George, HectorrahZF

Administrators: John Greenewald: 381, blackvault: 1777