Destroy the Trolls | Page 23 | Battle Forum | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Destroy the Trolls
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
221
February 25, 2016 - 7:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

sandra said
I am done taking shit for making the right suggestion. Why you soo salty at1? :p

Stop trashing this beautiful forum!Kiss

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
222
March 6, 2016 - 6:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
223
March 7, 2016 - 10:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
224
March 9, 2016 - 7:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
225
March 13, 2016 - 8:54 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9907009

Based on a calculation of neural decoherence rates, we argue that that the degrees of freedom of the human brain that relate to cognitive processes should be thought of as a classical rather than quantum system, i.e., that there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the current classical approach to neural network simulations. We find that the decoherence timescales ~10^{-13}-10^{-20} seconds are typically much shorter than the relevant dynamical timescales (~0.001-0.1 seconds), both for regular neuron firing and for kink-like polarization excitations in microtubules. This conclusion disagrees with suggestions by Penrose and others that the brain acts as a quantum computer, and that quantum coherence is related to consciousness in a fundamental way.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Avatar
khanster
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 708
Member Since:
September 19, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
226
September 2, 2016 - 2:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

at1with0 said
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9907009

Based on a calculation of neural decoherence rates, we argue that that the degrees of freedom of the human brain that relate to cognitive processes should be thought of as a classical rather than quantum system, i.e., that there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the current classical approach to neural network simulations. We find that the decoherence timescales ~10^{-13}-10^{-20} seconds are typically much shorter than the relevant dynamical timescales (~0.001-0.1 seconds), both for regular neuron firing and for kink-like polarization excitations in microtubules. This conclusion disagrees with suggestions by Penrose and others that the brain acts as a quantum computer, and that quantum coherence is related to consciousness in a fundamental way.  

http://phys.org/news/2014-01-d.....rates.html

A review and update of a controversial 20-year-old theory of consciousness published in Physics of Life Reviews claims that consciousness derives from deeper level, finer scale activities inside brain neurons. The recent discovery of quantum vibrations in "microtubules" inside brain neurons corroborates this theory, according to review authors Stuart Hameroff and Sir Roger Penrose. They suggest that EEG rhythms (brain waves) also derive from deeper level microtubule vibrations, and that from a practical standpoint, treating brain microtubule vibrations could benefit a host of mental, neurological, and cognitive conditions.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-01-d.....s.html#jCp

Avatar
khanster
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 708
Member Since:
September 19, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
227
September 5, 2016 - 6:54 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Testing ...testing ...123 ...testing

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
21 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
2 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10043

bionic: 9877

at1with0: 9242

Lashmar: 5757

tigger: 4576

rath: 4332

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3282

Newest Members:

Lucy Orellana

Maryjo Golder

Carmen Hooley

Tanesha Tarleton

Richard Raphael

Hamish Lininger

BrettMaitoGR

CharlesgopayLL

Alina Bagrova

Wallace Borelli

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8152

Posts: 121423

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 19370

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Administrators: John Greenewald, blackvault